<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When issuing a building permit does the DTS in the BCA always apply?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/564/building-permits-dts-not-appplicable/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/564/building-permits-dts-not-appplicable</link>
	<description>Building Regulations, Permits, Codes and the BCA for Architects and Building Designers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What is the problem with solid core tight fitting doors for a building permit? &#124; The Building Regulations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/564/building-permits-dts-not-appplicable/comment-page-1#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the problem with solid core tight fitting doors for a building permit? &#124; The Building Regulations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=564#comment-443</guid>
		<description>[...] think this is a classic case of the solutions in the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions not meeting the mandatory performance requirements. But they are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think this is a classic case of the solutions in the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions not meeting the mandatory performance requirements. But they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
