<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Building Regulations Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au</link>
	<description>Building Regulations, Permits, Codes and the BCA for Architects and Building Designers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 08:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is that mechanical ventilation, air handling or air-conditioning?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1510/building-permits-mechanical-ventilation</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1510/building-permits-mechanical-ventilation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 08:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Surveying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoke Hazard Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air conditioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AS1668.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AS3666.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical ventilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetIt&#8217;s obvious, is it not (to mechanical designers, contractors, service technicians, fridgies)? Well, maybe not to building certifiers and the facility managers (and contractors) who suffer from the result of this common misunderstanding.
AIRAH&#8217;s maintenance bible DA19 HVAC &#38; R Maintenance makes a clear distinction in the title. It&#8217;s about Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration systems. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1510/building-permits-mechanical-ventilation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When does the approved use of a building change for an occupancy permit?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1492/building-permits-change-of-use</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1492/building-permits-change-of-use#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCA Classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Regulations 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change of use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetThe Building Regulations in Victoria provide little guidance as to what this actually means. Regulation 1011 states:
&#8220;A person must not change the use of a building or place of public entertainment unless the building or place of public entertainment complies with the requirements of these Regulations applicable to the new use.&#8221;
Many Private Building Surveyors have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1492/building-permits-change-of-use/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough building codes couldn&#8217;t save Christchurch from unknown fault line</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1429/building-permits-tough-building-codes</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1429/building-permits-tough-building-codes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPENZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZSEE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetOne of the things that has come to light about the New Zealand earthquake centred near Christchuch is the existence of a previously unknown faultline. This was only identified last September. According to ABC NEWS Geoscience and Isotope Research Agency seismologist John Ristau views what happened in Christchurch as being different.
&#8220;What was a bit unusual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1429/building-permits-tough-building-codes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the Association for Specialist Fire Protection &#8220;COLOUR&#8221; Books?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1431/building-permits-asfp-colour-books</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1431/building-permits-asfp-colour-books#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colour Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passive Fire Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetYou might have heard of the red book? And you would be thinking CSR Gyprock Fire and Acoustic Systems? If you have found this a useful document there is another Red Book available &#8230;. and a grey book, a blue book and an orange book. These are published by the ASFP (Association for Specialist Fire [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1431/building-permits-asfp-colour-books/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you an architect with a cool idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1447/building-permits-architect</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1447/building-permits-architect#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (FSC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bluescope Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorbond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetAdelaide architect awarded $20,000 for &#8216;Cool Idea&#8217;
In conjunction with the launch of BlueScope Steel&#8217;s COLORBOND® Coolmax® steel roofing product a competition was launched at Sydney&#8217;s DesignEx in April 2010 &#8211; COLORBOND® Coolmax® &#8216;Cool Ideas&#8217; competition. The winner was Jason Chambers from DesignInc, Adelaide, who netted himself a cash prize of $20,000.
According to BlueScope Steel:
&#8220;Architects, building [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1447/building-permits-architect/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the key requirements of the access to premises standards for a building permit?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1438/building-permits-access-to-premises</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1438/building-permits-access-to-premises#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (FSC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Access to Premises Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disabled Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to premises standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetThe media release on the HREOc website notes that &#8220;some of the major changes from the current BCA requirements [in the new Access to Premises Standards] will include:

Increases in the number of accessible entrances and doorways to buildings.
Increases in circulation space requirements in most places such as in lifts, accessible toilets and at doorways.
Some improvements [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1438/building-permits-access-to-premises/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A new house&#8221; &#8211; building a resource for new house buyers and owners – one blog at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1409/building-permits-a-new-house</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1409/building-permits-a-new-house#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Building Contracts Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Houses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetBrian from the blog &#8220;A new house&#8221; recently posted a comment one of our posts. Brian&#8217;s blog is a really interesting and practical blog, with lots of pictures and lots of practical issues and solutions for the new house buyer.
Whilst his blog target market is a bit different to ours i.e. Prospective owners vs Archite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1409/building-permits-a-new-house/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do external landscape stairs have to comply with the BCA? Do you need a building permit?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1398/building-permits-external-stairs</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1398/building-permits-external-stairs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OH&S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external stairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landscape Architecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetDavid Swinson, BDC&#8217;s Director, was recently doing a presentation to some architects from Thomson Adsett Architects with Joe Zita from Approval Systems. David was talking about the changes in the BCA 2011 to stairs (Late breaking  news they may not be introduced until 2012 now!?!) and the question was raised about external stairs and compliance with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1398/building-permits-external-stairs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For a building permit what is the difference between &#8220;suitable to occupy&#8221; and compliance?</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1377/building-permits-suitable-to-occupy</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1377/building-permits-suitable-to-occupy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David (BDC) Swinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Building Act 1993]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Building Contracts Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupancy Permits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetFSC have recently been working on a state government project where we found some research that indicated that consumers for building work may not understand the difference between &#8220;suitable to occupy&#8221; and compliance. There is an important difference.
One of the problems is that &#8220;suitability to occupy&#8221; is not defined. So a building surveyor might not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1377/building-permits-suitable-to-occupy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get a yes from Council for planning!</title>
		<link>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1361/building-permits-planning</link>
		<comments>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1361/building-permits-planning#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/?p=1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetOne of our prospective clients Sharon Comber from DCF design recently forwarded us a brochure they have developed on this issue. Darren, the Director of DCF Design, tells us that
 &#8220;As many as 30% of town planning applications across Victoria do not get approved at council stage. This means that many applications are being rejected or required [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buildingregulations.com.au/1361/building-permits-planning/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

