Posts Tagged ‘BCA’

What is an Energy Rating report for JV3 supposed to contain for issue of a building permit?

Saturday, October 16th, 2010

Image courtesy of zedfactory

A building permit checklist for JV3!

What makes this topic so confusing for everybody is the plethora of Energy Rating systems out there for assessing the energy efficiency of a design. So, to provide some clarity let’s define what we are talking about here to satisfy the requirements of JV3 in Section J of Volume 1 of the Building Code of Australia.

We are getting more comfortable with the reports for Energy Efficiency in the Housing Code, but the stuff we are getting for the non-domestic stuff, in particular for alterations, leaves a lot to be desired.

Because the ABCB is bounded by National Competition Policy (and probably state based trade practices legislation) it appears they cannot prescribe what a report must look like. The key thing is that it contains certain “minimum” information. The broad principles for that information are contained in the “ABCB protocols for energy rating software”, but is also defined (for non-domestic buildings) in Clause A2.2 of Volume 1.

Before we get to our checklist below – let’s start with what BCA A2.2 says. It’s the key clause in the BCA for evidence of compliance. Principally it says to assess compliance with the ABCB protocol you need either:

  1. a certificate from a professional engineer (defined term in the BCA); or
  2. a certificate from an other appropriately qualified person (not defined); or
  3. “Any other form of documentary evidence that correctly describes how the calculation method complies with a relevant ABCB protocol”.

As per the BCA definition the building surveyor / accredited certifier etc must evaluate the engineer or person’s “appropriate experience and competence in the relevant field.” Thanks ABCB guys! So basically we can accept anything? No, Clause A2.2 does clarify that:

  1. the certificate “certifies that the calculation method complies with a relevant ABCB protocol”; and
  2. “sets out the basis on which it is given and the extent to which relevant specifications, rules, codes of practice and other publications have been relied upon.”

Ok, maybe this explains why the reports we get are like they are. Nobody else understands either!?! (Now we are getting to the detail of a possible checklist). The ABCB protocol document also says: (more…)

For issue of a building permit why don’t you need to classify a roof top carpark?

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

Rooftop bar

Or what about an unroofed entertainment area on top of a Hotel building? Or a roof top plant platform?

The key to this issue is the defined concept in the Building Code of Australia (BCA) of a “storey“. A storey is defined as being between a floor and a floor or roof above. So, if there is not floor or roof above there is no storey. If the space is not a storey it means (under the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions of the BCA):

  1. No “exits” are required;
  2. No Fire Hose Reels are required; and
  3. No exit signs or emergency lights are required.

So what is the point of classifying an area which is not a storey? (Classification of the use is the first step in characterising the physical characteristics and dominant occupancy characteristics of a building. ) There is no point!

Just as well building permits don’t require us to address Occupational Health and Safety or the Common Law or Disabled Access (Hang On! That last one is now something building surveyors will now have to administer come May 2011!)

For a building permit can a Building Surveyor ask you to do more than the DTS in the BCA?

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010
The 10 commandments

Image courtesy of Bible Picture Gallery

For issue of a building permit are the DTS provisions always a suitable building solution for compliance with the mandatory performance requirements?

The Building Regulations do not permit the Relevant Building Surveyor in Victoria Australia to require a higher requirement for issue of a building permit than the Act or the Regulations require. Section 24 (2) of the Building Act 1993 states that:

“Subject to section 24A and Division 4, the relevant building surveyor must not issue a building permit that imposes on the applicant lesser or greater standards or requirements than those prescribed by this Act or the building regulations, unless permitted to do so by this Act or the building regulations.”

(S24A lists further limitations related to builders for domestic work and requirements for building practitioner registration.) For those of you who have been around a whilst you will recall that before May 1996 there was only one way of satisfying this – the prescriptive provisions in the Building Code of Australia. After May 1996 this changed when the performance based  BCA was introduced.

Given that the BCA performance requirements are the mandatory provisions and the DTS are only one way of demonstrating compliance with them – are there designs where the DTS are not enough? (more…)